kur Interesting / What was “design thinking” that was supposed to change the world? MIT Tech Review: What was “design thinking” that was supposed to change the world?
kur > It became clear that the issue was difficult to solve with [Large number of sticky notes No, rather, did anyone really think that issues could be solved with a large number of sticky notes…?
-
nishio characters
-
A: A decent design thinker.
-
B: Idea of using tons of sticky notes communication with the dead ritual and claiming “it’s design thinking” cheater.
-
C: I was cheated by scammer B naive person.
-
D: People who look at C and think “[Design thinking is a scam.
-
A: People are confused when D criticizes them.
-
kur Very likely…
-
kur that design thinking is a good method for creating concept, but it doesn’t cover the subsequent social implementation. I think it’s true, and I don’t think design thinkers are saying it can.
After all, it would require other methods such as lean or scrum to finish the process, and it is definitely not an easy task.
kur Between “introducing design thinking will cause innovation” and “design thinking is effective as a tool for innovation” is a crazy There is a huge difference. It is only people who make innovation happen. - Stationery does not make the text.
Yothy44 How are you helping people understand this? We have been working steadily at the grassroots level, but…
kur I don’t think we have to make them understand, or rather, we have to tell them as it is. w
Yothy44 Oh, well, that’s true, w I think you mean that even if they expect it, it’s just [It’s just a tool.
kur There may be some Expected Value Adjustment when training, though.
This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/「デザイン思考」とは 何だったのか](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/「デザイン思考」とは 何だったのか) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.